How iGaming Businesses Are Valued: The Main Methods

The short answer

iGaming businesses are valued in three ways. The market approach multiplies normalised earnings or revenue by a multiple drawn from comparable deals; it is the main method for most casinos, sportsbooks and affiliate sites. The income approach discounts expected future cash flows, and is used for larger or fast-changing businesses. The asset approach values what could be sold separately, such as a player database, domains, a licence or source code, and usually sets a floor rather than the price.

The result should always be a range, not a single figure. Two buyers can look at the same business and reach different numbers because they will run it differently. A strategic operator that can move players onto its own platform will pay for synergies; a financial buyer keeping it standalone will not. A good valuation shows the low, middle and high case, and explains what would move the price between them.

Market approach: multiples and comparables

Value = normalised earnings (or revenue) × a multiple

The earnings base depends on the asset: SDE for owner-run affiliate sites and small casinos, EBITDA for operators and groups with management, NGR or revenue where the buyer is paying for players or contracts rather than current profit. The base is almost always the trailing 12 months, normalised for one-off and owner-specific items.

The multiple comes from comparable transactions: what similar assets have sold for, relative to the same earnings measure. In iGaming, comparable data is patchy. Most small and mid-sized deals are private, and the published ones are often large listed-company acquisitions that are not comparable to a single brand or site. So the multiple is a judgement, anchored on the deals that are known and adjusted for the specific business.

Two rules keep the market approach honest:

• Compare like with like. A multiple of SDE is not a multiple of EBITDA, and a multiple of NGR is something else again. Mixing them produces meaningless numbers.
• Show the adjustments. Every reason for moving above or below the reference range should be stated, so a buyer can follow it.

Our iGaming M&A acquisitions database tracks published deals in the sector, and our methodology page sets out our approach.

Income approach: discounted cash flow

A discounted cash flow (DCF) forecasts the cash the business will generate over the next several years, then discounts it back to today at a rate that reflects the risk. The higher the risk, the higher the discount rate, and the lower the value.

In iGaming, DCF is most useful for:

• Larger operators and platforms with several years of stable history
• Businesses in transition, such as one entering a newly regulated market, where the trailing 12 months does not reflect the future
• Checking whether a multiple-based price makes sense: if the implied growth or risk looks unrealistic, the multiple probably is too

It is less useful for small affiliate sites, where a forecast beyond the next year depends heavily on search algorithms nobody can predict. The weakness of any DCF is that small changes in growth or discount rate move the result a lot. Treat it as a cross-check, and show the assumptions so a buyer can disagree with them openly.

Asset approach: the floor

The asset approach asks what the parts would be worth if sold separately. For an iGaming business those parts are mostly intangible:

• Licence. A clean licence in a market that is hard to enter has value of its own, because a buyer would otherwise spend months and significant costs applying. It only transfers with the company, in a share deal.
• Player database. Active and dormant players have reactivation value to an operator, subject to the data being lawfully transferable and the marketing consents being valid.
• Domains and brand. Aged, relevant domains and a recognisable brand.
• Content and links. For affiliate sites, the content library and backlink profile that would take years to rebuild.
• Source code and platform. For businesses with their own technology, the cost and time to build an equivalent.
• Contracts. Favourable platform, provider or affiliate deals that a buyer could not get on its own.

The asset approach rarely sets the price for a profitable business, because earnings are worth more than the parts. It matters most for loss-making operators, businesses that are winding down, and platforms sold primarily for their technology. In those cases it is the realistic floor.

Which method fits which asset

Most valuations use one main method and one cross-check. If the two disagree widely, that disagreement is the most useful part of the work: it shows which assumption needs testing.

What moves the multiple up or down

No factor works alone. A business with excellent growth but a licence that will not transfer may still sell at a lower multiple than a flatter business with a clean, transferable licence.

Putting it together: an illustrative range

The figures and multiples below are illustrative, chosen only to show how a range is built. They are not market benchmarks.

A Curaçao-licensed casino has normalised EBITDA of EUR 400,000 over the trailing 12 months. Growth has been steady, but 35% of GGR comes from the top 20 players and it relies on one main PSP.

The range tells a seller three useful things. What the business is likely worth. Which buyers are likely to pay the top of the range. And what would move it: diversifying the VIP base and adding a second PSP would make the high case easier to reach.

Our valuation service follows this structure: method, inputs, normalisation adjustments, the multiple range with its reasoning, and the low, mid and high values.

FAQ

How do you value an online casino?

Usually by multiplying normalised EBITDA (or NGR, if profit is thin) by a multiple based on comparable deals, then adjusting for licence, trend, player concentration, payment stack and platform. Larger operators may be cross-checked with a DCF.

How do you value an affiliate site?

Usually as a multiple of SDE or EBITDA over the trailing 12 months, adjusted for traffic diversification, exposure to Google updates, operator concentration and the revenue-share and CPA mix.

Why is a valuation a range and not one number?

Because different buyers will pay different amounts for the same business, depending on what they can do with it. A range shows the likely outcomes and the reasons behind each.

Do buyers pay for future potential?

Rarely in the headline price. They pay for what the business has done and can evidence. Potential is more often paid for through an earnout, if at all.

Is the licence valued separately?

Not usually in a profitable business, where it is part of what supports the multiple. For a loss-making operator, the licence and the player database can set the floor value.

How long does a valuation take?

It depends on how quickly the financial and traffic data is available. With a reconciled monthly P&L and platform or programme reports, it is mostly a matter of analysis rather than data gathering.

Prefer Telegram? Join iGaming professionals on @igamingdealflow